dryfter: (angel)
[personal profile] dryfter
This has probably already hit other peoples' journals by now, but anyway:
A passenger sitting next to Henry Rollins on a flight (from New Zealand to Australia) reported Rollins to the Australian anti-terror police as a potential terrorist, because Rollins was reading Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia. Rollins received a letter informing him of this, apparently saying that the government knew it was probably "idiotic", but they do follow up all tip-offs.

The thing that scares me here is that people are dobbing in each other to a secret police who then have sufficient grounds to spy on you. Yeah, I know, I know, if you're not doing anything wrong, then you don't have anything to worry about, I've heard it before.. but I still don't like the apparent fact that people are turning each other in based on nothing more than the books they are reading.

It's really not a good look.

I hope that anonymous passenger is feeling stupid by now.

(Thanks to Jason-WINOLJ for the link)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-20 01:18 pm (UTC)
redcountess: (Default)
From: [personal profile] redcountess
Hey, look on the bright side - it gave Hank some material for his spoken word ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-20 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tbrd.livejournal.com
The worrying thing here is not the secret police itself, it's the fact that people are actually turning on their fellow citizens because they are -reading- about it. I'm not sure if it's the same here, or just in the States.


"If you're not doing anything wrong, you won't have anything to worry about."

Most of the time, I agree with this. Police walking the beat. Customs inspections. CCTV. In rare cases, I don't. I can't think of any off-hand.

If you're in a responsible society where you think you can pretty much trust the gov. to do the right thing at least most of the time, then the things that people worry about (oyster cards, cctv... um... other stuff) in terms of 'Big brother', aren't a problem.

However, governments change. The US is a prime example of this. The spirit of laws brought in to protect the populace in times when they needed protecting is being shat upon. Will Britain go the same way? Difficult to say.

There are governments where I think that the policemen on the streets have too much power over you. Men with guns. Border guards and customs in other countries aren't exactly reliable or safe.

I'm rambling.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-20 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wintrmute.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think I got the emphasis wrong when I said "The thing that scares me here is that people are dobbing in each other to a secret police who then have sufficient grounds to spy on you." (Emphasis added this time)

But hey.. we already knew that the average person on the street doesn't trust anyone else. Everyone has been twice bitten before.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-21 08:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tbrd.livejournal.com
Have you read the actual letter?

http://21361.com/site_2004/main_dispatches.html

It's... well... Rollins is a complete ass, isn't he?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-21 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wintrmute.livejournal.com
I hadn't seen the copy for the actual letter he received - reading it there (under 01/30/06, bloody american dates), I see the letter from the government is more of an apology, and says that they would actually like to call the "lunatic" who reported Rollins, to discuss his "idiocy".

To that, I think that Rollins' response (go fuck yourself) is a bit misguided :(

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-20 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drreagan.livejournal.com
"If you're not doing anything wrong, you won't have anything to worry about." ... "CCTV" ...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4510786.stm

Obviously, nothing to worry about.

Assuming that there are checks in place to stop the watchers abusing the system. Problem is, most of the time there isn't. Particularly when these measures get rushed in quickly as a knee-jerk response to some incident.


(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-21 08:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tbrd.livejournal.com
It's an abuse of the system, but everyone abuses every system on a personal level. The law seems to be working in this case, which is a good sign. When the government as a body abuses the system, then I would start to worry.

There are a lot of knee-jerk responses, but I believe in a lot of cases the incidents are used as a reason, rather than being the cause. ID cards are a good idea, IMO, if done right (the fact that the implementation will probably suck is by the by). The 'terrorist threat' was an excuse to get them pushed through.

I don't believe that the government wants to control us, or that they will use this sort of thing to hurt us. I don't believe that it is the first step towards a police state. I -think- that Britain is a pretty liberal place and is likely to stay that way.

Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 02:47 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com


Don't suspect your friends - inform on them!



It's an interesting time to be a noncomformist with anarchist leanings. But I suspect that I have nothing new to say on the matter; so try a couple of tired and trite observations (http://hairyears.livejournal.com/61674.html) from the recent past:




Meanwhile, we have a new kind of life: living with fear. Fear of terrorists, fear of our own police force, fear of little men with notebooks under far too much pressure from their superiors to get results.



And I recall blogging this little gem (http://hairyears.livejournal.com/71542.html) a couple of weeks ago: not all informers work for the government, and some of them are paid a great deal of money for what they do.




It's not like we have a secret police, listening at the walls and keeping tens of thousands of informers, waiting for that chance remark about Comrade Stalin to come to light. But if the papers are applying thousands of man-hours, compiling vast databases, and paying tens of thousands of pounds for information, how is that different?




Wake up and smell the coffee. We don't have free elections in this country any more. The word of a paid informer can - and will, if your life comes into the public eye - result in your subjected to public humiliations and punishments that will make you wish you had been sent to prison, for your own safety.







Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiselwright.livejournal.com
> Don't suspect your friends - inform on them!

The current wave of irritating station announcements seem to be " . If you suspect it, report it."

I wonder how much fun I could have by suspecting something and reporting it ... something random each day perhaps. I'm sure I don't need actual evidence to suspect something.

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
I suspect that this man farted in the lift! I suspect that stain on the wall is semen! I suspect the person who dropped that kebab was very drunk indeed! I suspect that was a tube mouse! I suspect this gentleman here is thinking about penguins!

I'm so glad I don't travel by tube very much. Everybody would throw me out in a matter of minutes.

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiselwright.livejournal.com
Some great ideas there ... I wonder how the lobotomised station staff would cope.

I'm glad I don't travel by the tube either. Shame I have to use Thameslink though.

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
They're not all lobotomised, I reported an unattended rucksack once and they were very efficient and organised. Less so the woman who walked past me to stand in front of the member of staff and shout into his face as he was talking on the walkie talkie to his colleague "Excuuse meee, maiy Oyster card isn't working in that machaine ayver there".

Minging Rim Mystery Today!

Date: 2006-02-20 05:29 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com


Penguins... I Googled for exploding penguins: it would appear that you have a perfectly valid National Security Concern, citizen.

Farting: less amusing. Saying 'That man smells of poison gas' will get us all sent to Guantanamo Bay.

As for the stains, I am reminded of the deeply uncharitable remark made about one of the admin girls, who had shagged her way through our Quant desk (most of whom were mathematicians with Doctorates from unpronounceable engineering institutes in Moscow):

  • What, she's done Sergei as well as Andriy?
  • ...And Dmitri.
  • FFS they'll send down a rescue submarine.
  • ...WTF are you on about? Rescue Submarine? Wossat?
  • Trapped Russian Seamen.




The Ministry Will Ring Tonight

Date: 2006-02-20 05:10 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com


It's been done. Under the Money-Laundering provisions of the Financial Services Act, accountants and solicitors involved in tax and contractual work have to report everything that might be a suspicious transaction.

So they report everything, and there is so much information that the authorities are snowed under. Effectively, there is no information.

With respect to supplying information to the security services, I'd advise against it. Firstly, you could send people to prison - that's no joke; secondly, you could piss off the Security Services enought for them to make your life miserable; and, thirdly, you might want to look up the backlash against Stasi informers in the former Occupied Zone in Eastern Germany.

Re: The Ministry Will Ring Tonight

Date: 2006-02-20 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiselwright.livejournal.com
I had no intention of reporting anything to the security services ... just the platform staff

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
I must start wearing my "I'm not afraid" T-shirt in public more. Unfortunately it's a bit faded now (stupid fabric paint). I ought to print some more.

I wonder if they do bulk discounts on T-shirt printing.

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiselwright.livejournal.com
is it faded because you're so not afraid it's the only thing you ever wear?

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
No, it's faded because I didn't iron it for long enough to fix the fabric paint properly, because ironing is boring.

I'm From The Ministry: Kiss My Ring

Date: 2006-02-20 05:03 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
I want a T-Shirt saying:



I hope that people will be reassured by this.

Re: I'm From The Ministry: Kiss My Ring

Date: 2006-02-20 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wintrmute.livejournal.com
The only statement that could possibly be any more disturbing to people would be one that said:
DO NOT BE ALARMED

Ginger Mini Stir Fry King

Date: 2006-02-20 05:55 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
Have you ever been tempted to print up a roll of official-looking safety stickers:









Re: Ginger Mini Stir Fry King

Date: 2006-02-21 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nassus.livejournal.com
OOH I wants - can I use this please <<-:

Re: Ginger Mini Stir Fry King

Date: 2006-02-21 11:07 am (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
Of course you can!

What, me, a Discordian?

Re: Ring the Ministry today.

Date: 2006-02-20 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiselwright.livejournal.com
http://www.printedclothing.com/ were pretty good last time I used them - no sign of fading yet.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-20 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arkady.livejournal.com
Found my way here via [livejournal.com profile] hairyears. Your story of Rollins' encounter reminds me of something that happened when I was a line controller for the District Line on LUL.

I got a phonecall from the BTP. They wanted me to stop the next Upminster train that arrived at Earls Court and hold it there until the police could arrive. Why? Because someone at Baron's Court had seen an "Arabic-looking man" sitting in the first car reading the Q'ran.

Was he reading it in an alarming and loud manner? No. Was he abusing other passengers? No. Did he have a scarily suspicious-looking backpack with him? No. He was just another commuter who happened to have dark skin.

I told the BTP caller I wasn't going to hold the train (especially as they would take about 15 minutes to get there, which would have crucified the service). "But...you have to! I'm telling you to hold it!"

"Listen, mate, last time I looked reading books on the tube wasn't illegal." And I ordered the driver to proceed. The Duty Operations Manager backed me up.

If it had been a white man reading the Bible, no-one would have batted an eyelid.

Profile

dryfter: (Default)
Toby "dryfter" Wintermute

December 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213 1415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios